fbpx
 

Igor

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,632 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ZM 30JUL JADE LIZZARD #18293

    Igor
    Keymaster

    ZM at 369.43

    I’m going to set up a trade where I am selling a slightly OTM call spread and I will cover any upside risk by selling an OTM put naked.

    Here’s the trade details:

    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    in reply to: RUT 30JUL Scaling Income Butterfly #18294

    Igor
    Keymaster

    RUT at 2268

    We’re not quiet at 2250 where I said I’d scale down, but with RUT moving almost 2SD today, this tells me that intraday vol is starting to pick up.

    I’m going to play a bit more defensive here and take down Tier 2, leaving only Tier 1 open. I will add Tier 2 as I would normally do it IF/WHEN RUT trades back above 2330

    Trade Update/Order Ticket:
    image

    in reply to: FCX 18JUN CALL SPREAD (2059) #18323

    Igor
    Keymaster

    FCX at 35.19

    My remaining part of this trade is going to expire worthless. This trade is a loss but a much smaller loss, relative to original risk in the trade.

    in reply to: ETSY 18JUN/02JUL CALL DIAGONAL (2076) #18324

    Igor
    Keymaster

    ETSY at 169.01

    I’m going to take this trade off for a small win

    Closing Order Ticket:

    in reply to: ETSY 20AUG CALL BUTTERFLY (2114) #18327

    Igor
    Keymaster

    ETSY at 177.61

    I’m looking to set up a bullish trade with 59 days until expiration, looking for a move towards 200 level

    Here are my thoughts:


    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    Risk: 5.20
    Reward: upto 14.80
    POP: 33%

    in reply to: V 16JUL CALL SPREAD (2060) #18328

    Igor
    Keymaster

    V at 236.75

    I’m going to roll up 220/225 Call spread up to 230/235 strikes, converting this trade into a Call Butterfly with no risk remaining in the trade.

    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    in reply to: NKE 20AUG CALL BUTTERFLY (2091) #18329

    Igor
    Keymaster

    NKE at 152.07

    I’m going to roll up the 135 call up to 140 strike, removing all of the risk out of this trade. This will leave a balanced butterfly open with 56 days until expiration.

    Video:

    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    in reply to: RUT 30JUL Scaling Income Butterfly #18330

    Igor
    Keymaster

    RUT at 2341

    I’m going to add Tier 2 butterfly, 70X50 for a debit of 3.00

    Video:

    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    in reply to: Income Navigator LIVE Archive #18331

    Igor
    Keymaster

    Date: 06/25/2021

    in reply to: LEN 16JUL CALL SPREAD (2087) #18340

    Igor
    Keymaster

    LEN at 100.52

    I’m going to take this trade off for a profit and look for a new set up

    Closing Order Ticket:

    TOS: BUY 1 +2/-1/-1 CUSTOM LEN 100 16 Jul 21/16 Jul 21/16 Jul 21 100/105/97.5 Call/Call/Call @0.30 LMT

    in reply to: LEN 20AUG CALL SPREAD (2118) #18341

    Igor
    Keymaster

    LEN at 100

    Chart:

    I’m going to pick up a Call Spread with a long option being ITM and a short option being OTM. August options are pricing in a move around 10 points. Buying 97.5/105 Call spread should be a winning trade if the stock moves at or more of the expected move to the upside.

    Risk: 3.60
    Reward: 3.90
    POP: 47%

    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    in reply to: Position Size: Is 1-2% Really Suitable for Every Trade? #18342

    Anonymous

    Learn to Trade
    Position Size: Is 1-2% Really Suitable for Every Trade?

    We traders tend to fixate so much on ensuring accurate analysis that important factors like choosing a proper position size tend to get overlooked. Yet position size is critical to long-term trading success, and is directly related to how well (or poorly) we manage the application of risk in the markets.

    Most commonly, traders in any market are advised to risk no more than 1-2% of their overall trading account on any given trade, but there are alternate theories out there. And because forex trades are measured in pips, not dollars, choosing a risk-minded position size translates directly into how many standard lots, or mini lots, or perhaps even micro lots the trader should buy or sell to participate in the market without being overly susceptible to a large drawdown.

    What follows is a candid discussion about position size, why we favor the standard, 1-2% rule, and when, if ever, traders should differ from it.

    Why 1-2% Is a Valid “Default” Position Size
    Why 1-2% Is a Good Position SizeIt’s generally accepted across a host of markets that 1-2% is the “standard” position size, and we Lazy Traders happen to subscribe to that theory as well. New or conservative traders are often advised to risk 1% or less of their total account balance on any given trade, while more experienced traders and/or those with a higher risk tolerance can go as high as 2%. Here’s how position size may be calculated for forex:

    Account risk (in dollars) / (Trade Risk (in pips) x Pip value*) = Position size (in lots)
    *For USD-based accounts, pip values are: $.10 (micro lot), $1 (mini lot), and $10 (standard lot)

    For example, a trader with a $5000 account size risking 1% on a EURUSD position with 25 pips between the entry and stop loss could buy or sell ($5000 x 1%) / (25 x $1) 2 mini lots or ($5000 x 1%) / (25 x $.01) 20 micro lots, which, of course, are the same thing.

    Here’s why 1-2% represents a good position size:

    Risk-aversion: Even good traders and proven trading strategies lose from time to time, and sometimes multiple trades in a row. A modest 1-2% position size helps ensure that even if you lost 5 or 10 consecutive trades—which would be unlikely, but possible nonetheless—the resulting account damage would be recoverable in rather short order. In the event of a 5-10% position size, however, the same couldn’t be said, and all or a majority of the trading account would be wiped out.

    Diversification: Position size is also a means for preventing overexposure to any one particular asset or currency pair, since it stands to reason that most traders routinely have multiple positions open at one time. Observing the 1-2% rule maintains a larger cash component and prevents large segments of your portfolio from being tied up in one asset in the event that a geopolitical event or sudden policy change from a central bank causes a steep decline. It’s happened before, afterall!

    4 Times You Might Opt for Smaller Position Size
    When to Reduce Position SizeUnder “normal” trading conditions, it’s said that the “standard” position size is perfectly acceptable. So with that, when volume and volatility are not spiking in one direction or the other, and in the absence of major news like additional QE or central bank intervention, a new geopolitical event, or a spike in oil and/or equity markets, a 1-2% position size should be fine.

    If, however, the markets are in a heightened stage of risk, perhaps 1% traders should move down to .5%, and aggressive, 2% traders should adjust their position size to 1%. Here are some instances where that may be the case:

    Low-volume, low-volatility conditions: In the “summer doldrums” of July and August, and to a lesser degree, in late-December around the holidays, when traders and investors are on the sidelines, price action tends to slow to a dull crawl, and with volume and volatility low, it can be harder to exit a position quickly, if need be, which often warrants a smaller position size.

    In times of market and/or economic turmoil: Conversely, when volatility spikes higher in response to unexpected market events like a military conflict, banking or financial scandal, or flare-up in the Eurozone debt crisis, many traders will revert back to trading half their normal position size to better control their risk exposure.

    On the heels of a large drawdown or losing streak: When easing back into the markets following a sizable loss or a few consecutive losing trades, a smaller position size can help calm your emotions as you aim to restore order and rebuild lost or shaken confidence.

    When trading a low-probability reversal set-up: Although part of a balanced, long-term trading approach, trend reversal set-ups represent high-risk, low- probability trading opportunities that are sometimes difficult to execute. For ultra-conservative traders, though, it would be possible to decrease the initial position size by one half, and then add to it later on pullbacks in the event that the reversal is confirmed and a new trend begins.

    And Is It Ever Wise to Trade More Than 1-2%?
    In the name of risk and money management and to remain disciplined in your trading approach, do not risk more than 2% of your account value on any given trade. While it may be tempting to trade larger size, say, when a set-up is especially clear and well defined on the chart, or if you’re in the midst of a recent winning streak, or even if you just “Have a good feeling” about a particular trade, the reward is simply not worth the risk.

    Particularly when trading a modest account for the long term, no single win is worth risking an oversized loss to attain. Instead, remain committed to trading small and consistently so as to absorb only small losses your wins can more than account for. Be highly disciplined and conservative with regard to position size for your best chance to grow and sustain your trading account for the long term.

    in reply to: TSLA 02JUL PUT BUTTERFLY #18343

    Igor
    Keymaster

    TSLA at 685

    With 2 days to go, this trade is pretty much at a max loss. I will let this trade run out.

    in reply to: Income Navigator LIVE Archive #18344

    Igor
    Keymaster

    Date: 6/30/2021

    in reply to: JD 17SEP CALL SPREAD (2100) #18345

    Igor
    Keymaster

    JD at 79

    I’m going to sell an ATM call credit spread to remove most of the risk out of this trade:

    Risk Profile:

    Order Ticket:

    TOS: BUY 1 -1/+1 CUSTOM JD 100 17 Sep 21/17 Sep 21 80/85 Call/Call @1.70 LMT

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,632 total)

Pin It on Pinterest